Vol. 78 No. 6 (2026)
Original Articles

Current status and perception of robotic colorectal surgery in Chile: a multicenter descriptive study

Victor Pino P.
Clínica Universidad de Los Andes
Bio
Alejandro Barrera E.
Hospital Clínico San Borja Arriarán
Bio
Jean M. Butte B.
Fundación Arturo López Pérez
Bio
Gonzalo Campaña V.
Clínica INDISA
Bio
Andrés Larach K.
Clínica Alemana de Santiago
Bio
José Tomás Larach K.
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Bio
Misael Ocares U.
Clínica Andes Salud Concepcion
Bio
Antonella Sanguineti M.
Clínica MEDS
Bio
Diego Zamorano V.
Hospital Clínico Félix Bulnes
Bio
Francisco López-Kostner
Clínica Universidad de Los Andes
Bio
Situación y percepción actual de la cirugía colorrectal robótica en Chile: estudio multicéntrico descriptivo

Published 2026-10-30

How to Cite

1.
Pino P. V, Barrera E. A, Butte B. JM, Campaña V. G, Larach K. A, Larach K. JT, et al. Current status and perception of robotic colorectal surgery in Chile: a multicenter descriptive study. Rev Cir. [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 30 [cited 2026 Oct. 31];78(6). Available from: https://www.revistacirugia.cl/index.php/revistacirugia/article/view/3192

Abstract

Objective: To characterize the status of robotic colorectal surgery in Chile through a multicenter descriptive study.

Methods: Observational, descriptive, multicenter study. The universe comprised all centers in Chile with an active robotic platform at the end of 2025 that had performed at least one robotic colorectal procedure (n=9; 100% response rate). Information was collected through a structured 48-item institutional survey. Analysis was exclusively descriptive.

Results: Nine centers participated, predominantly in the Metropolitan Region (89%) and mostly private institutions (67%). The most frequently used platform was da Vinci X (78%). The estimated total annual volume was approximately 294 procedures (a self-reported figure), with a median of 30 per center (range 7–70). Most centers (78%) reported conversion rates below 5%. As perceived by respondents, overall morbidity was below 5% and mortality below 1% across all centers. All respondents considered robotic surgery advantageous and agreed on the need for formal structured training.

Discussion: Adoption has been progressive and heterogeneous, concentrated in high-complexity centers. Perceived perioperative outcomes are consistent with international series. Main barriers remain costs, platform access, and specialized training.

Conclusion: Robotic colorectal surgery in Chile is in an active development phase. This first national characterization provides a solid basis to guide future training, registry, and consolidation strategies.